Desert Peace

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

PLAYBOY MAGAZINE GOES ANTI-SEMITIC

Image 'Copyleft' by Carlos Latuff
What does Playboy Magazine have in common with all those people, newspapers, magazines, editors, journalists, etc. listed by the infamous Zionist CAMERA as anti-Semite?

The answer is simple:

Playboy magazine, the racy but popular men’s magazine, has published in its October 2007 issue an article comparing Israel to apartheid South Africa. - CAMERA

There you go, Playboy dared to publish an article that criticize Israel and had the courage to describe what Israel does as war crimes. Result: CAMERA does not allow and works to silence any American media to say a single true word about ‘the only terrorist country in the Middle East, Israel.’

The article is not available online (at least so far), however, my lovely sister Robin was very generous to type it for me. It is worth reading to see why Playboy is now blacklisted and tagged “anti-Semite”:

Israel Shouldn’t Get a Free Pass: Real Debate Is Not Anti-Semetic
By Jonathan Tasini - Playboy magazine

playboyWhy can’t American Jews, particularly liberal Jews, think straight about Israel? American Jews can easily condemn the war in and occupation of Iraq, as well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and the violations of civil rights there. Yet the same passion for peace, justice and human rights is muted when it comes to talking about unpleasant activities in the Israeli government. American Jews and many politicians who pander for Jewish votes are hurting Israel and the cause of peace by refusing to have an honest debate about our country’s historically one-sided position vis-a-vis Israel and the Middle East conflict. An honest debate is underway within Israel itself, but in the US it’s impossible to be critical of Israel without being labeled anti-Semitic or worse.

Before I dive further into this, I should establish my bona fides for making this argument, which itself says alot about the terrain. I am a Jew. My father was born in what was then Palestine and fought in Israel’s war of independence. My father’s cousin was killed in that war. I lived in Israel for seven years, including the period of the 1973 Yom Kippur war. A cousin of mine was killed in that war, leaving behind a widow and two children. My step-grandfather, an ikd nab wgi was no threat to anyone was killed by a Palestinian who took an axe to his head while he was sitting quietly on a park bench. His murder was revenge for the massacre of dozens of peaceful Muslims the day before, slaughtered by an ultra-nationalist Israeli soldier as they knelt in prayer.

I care about Israel as I care about our country, but I wish to speak the truth about it. In 2006, when I ran in the New York Democratic primary for Senator because of incumbent Hillary Clinton’s support for the Iraq war, my campaign coincided with Israel’s bombing of Lebanon, a move triggered by the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers. While campaigning I said that Israel had committed acts that violated the Geneva Conventions and international standards. Within an hour reporters from all four New York daily papers called me, alerted to my comments by my opponent’s operatives. Betraying their bias, the reporters had no idea my position would not be considered novel or radical in Israel where the country’s conduct in the war was a topic of hot debate. Indeed, the reporters need only have consulted Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem.

Referring to last summer’s Lebanon bombing, B Tselem’s website states, “International humanitarian law…requires that the combating sides direct their attacks only against specific military objectives, take cautionary measures to prevent injury to civilians and refrain from disproportionate attacks, ie., attacks directed against legitimate targets but that are likely to cause excessive harm to civilians. Over the past week Israel has killed hundreds of Lebanese civilians in its attacks against targets in Lebanon. There is a concern that at least some of them were disproportionate attacks, which constitute war crimes”.

Here are some other inconvenient truths. Israel is holding 10,000 Palestinians in administrative detention where, according to B’Tselem, they are exposed to “moderate pressure”, a euphuism for torture. And while six Israeli soldiers and 17 civilians died last year, the Israeli military killed 660 Palestinians, roughly half of them innocent bystanders. So why is there such a lack of debate in the US?

Jews and non-Jews who can easily tell foreigners that being American is not the same as supporting the American government are incapable of making the same argument in Israel’s case. Elected officials won’t say anything because of the political cost or at least the perceived threat from Jewish voters. And there is residue from the Cold War, when Israel was seen as the region’s bulwark against the Soviet Union. Among Jews there is a reflexive “Israel right or wrong” attitude that is deeply rooted in the memory of the Holocaust. My own family lost people in the Holocaust. But the Holocaust should not be used as a moral shield to suppress honest criticism of Israel.

It’s also important to acknowledge that some critics of Israel undercut their own positions by painting a caricature of the country. Israel is a democracy, and like all democracies it has its flaws Nut the open debate heard in Israel is rarely heard in the regions’s other countries, most of which are ruled by dictators or generals. Israel has a very free rambunctious press” can the same be said about Egypt or Syria? Israel’s attorney general recently went after the country’s president for sexual harassment. We can’t even get Congress, not to mention the attorney general, to investigate the president for lying about a war.

These facts make Israel’s conduct even more troubling. The country’s democratic principles and societal fabric are being undermined by its role as an occupier. People who refuse to criticize Israel because of friendship are no friends to Israel. A true friend would not have stood by and remained silent as Israel dropped thousands of cluster bombs in Lebanon, leaving a million unexploded bomblets-small devices the size of a light socket that are still killing and injuring civilians-littered throughout the southern part of the country. A true friend would have taken Israel’s leaders to the woodshed and said, “Responding to Hezbollah is one thing, but turning Lebanon into rubble and embittering a new generation toward the existence of your country is madness”. Instead, politicians like Joe Lieberman and Clinton actually encouraged the bombing by uttering vigorous endorsements of Israel’s right to defend itself. A friend of Israel would not try to fan fears y tarring as anti-Semitic people who are critical of U.S. Middle East policy. Criticism of Israel may be painful to American Jews, but it is high time anyone, Jew or non-Jew, were able to raise questions about our one-sided policy without fear of a McCarthy like smear. A friend would argue strenuously that Israel’s moral fiber and security are weakened every moment it allows the so-called separation barrier in the West Bank to stand, in violation of international law. Whether Jews like the comparison or not, Jimmy Carter is correct in his book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid when he describes the control over Palestinian’s movements as similar to South Africa’s apartheid system.

As a Jew, I have always been proud of the Jewish concept of tikkun olam, which means roughly,”repairing the world.” I like to think it is hat brought so many Jews into the civil rights and labor movements in the 60’s and 70’s and in to the current antiwar movement. I feel great sorrow that Israel is an occupier of another people, and I believe Israel can never be whole or at peace until that occupation is ended in a just way. I also believe tikkun olam means we must never be silent.

(The article also has some pictures of destroyed houses, three pictures, but no captions so you can’t tell if it’s Lebanon or the Occupied Territories - Robin)

Because of the above, apparently Playboy is now “anti-Semitic” according to CAMERA. As Robin said: “It won’t be long before Sesame Street does SOMETHING to get on their nerves too!!

Author: Haitham



To Sabbah

To Robin





BTW.... The above PROVES that some people DO read Playboy for the articles....

11 Comments:

At 4:19 PM, October 03, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Strange. The CAMERA article that Mr. Sabbah claims brands Playboy as anti-Semitic actually doesn’t say such a thing. In fact, it says just the opposite on it’s homepage! “Jonathan Tasini’s comments on Israel are not anti-Semitic. They’re just wrong.” It’s possible that some people don’t know the difference between anti-Semitism and legitimate criticism of Israel… but unfortunately others can’t seem to tell the difference between those call Israel’s critics anti-Semites and those who simply disagree with those critics.

 
At 8:28 PM, October 03, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder how long it will take for Mr Hefner to suddenly die from a hard-on attack?

 
At 8:38 PM, October 03, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who is a Semite??

One of the myths that has been perpetrated on the world is that only Jews are semites. This is totally inaccurate. Unfortunately, the ADL (the Anti-Defamation League) has made a fortune in donations and has conned most media networks and most people in the world into believing this untruth.

I f one looks into the history of the word, “semite”, it has to do with a language group and no more. The semitic languages are, at least according to most linguistic experts, Amharic (spoken in Ethiopia and Eritrea, the lands once known as Abyssinia), Arabic (spoken in all the Arab countries and in many Muslim countries because it is the language of the Qur’an), Hebrew (spoken in Israel and by some Jews and others outside of Israel), Aramaic (spoken primarily by the Chaldeans of Iraq and by some Catholic and Maronite Christians in the world...
See One of the myths that has been perpetrated on the world is that only Jews are semites. This is totally inaccurate. Unfortunately, the ADL (the Anti-Defamation League) has made a fortune in donations and has conned most media networks and most people in the world into believing this untruth.

I f one looks into the history of the word, “semite”, it has to do with a language group and no more. The semitic languages are, at least according to most linguistic experts, Amharic (spoken in Ethiopia and Eritrea, the lands once known as Abyssinia), Arabic (spoken in all the Arab countries and in many Muslim countries because it is the language of the Qur’an), Hebrew (spoken in Israel and by some Jews and others outside of Israel), Aramaic (spoken primarily by the Chaldeans of Iraq and by some Catholic and Maronite Christians in the world...http://www.etresoi.ch/Denis/semitic.html

 
At 8:48 PM, October 03, 2007 , Anonymous Alan Cabal said...

Anyone who hasn't been labelled an "anti-Semite" by now is either a coward or a collaborator.

 
At 12:03 AM, October 04, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most Jews ARE liberals. Its just a small group of extreme nationalists in Israel that run things their way.
American jews traditionally have voted liberal democrat and that hasn't changed.

 
At 4:41 AM, October 04, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

playboy has articles??

 
At 11:50 AM, October 04, 2007 , Blogger DetainThis said...

Nice post, DP. I've reposted it on my blog.

 
At 3:49 PM, October 04, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Notice how the author disclaims himself as being jewish? When can non-religious freaks declare their disgust at US aid to support Israeli war crimes/genocide?

 
At 10:46 PM, November 26, 2007 , Anonymous musings said...

Even though it has been my experience that most Jews are indeed liberals, there is a "distance lends enchantment" attitude towards Israel. It means that because Israel has been beset by seemingly irrational attacks by suicide bombers and the like, there are those who feel "a country's gotta do what a country's gotta do" and they look the other way when what that country, Israel, does might be making fresh enemies, people who will nurse grievances for another generation after things like the cluster bombs of Lebanon. The people going around with missing limbs, the children learning to write with missing fingers, will provide a lot of publicity for why Israel has got to go. But the American Congress - mortally afraid of targeting by proponents of hardline Israeli pols - will cravenly give the blank check to the retaliation that happened in summer of 2006. They are also afraid in Congress of the tendency in American Jews to give the benefit of the doubt to Israel's actions, blood being thicker than water. Americans once enabled the very British Empire they broke from, on that same snobbish basis. And what about the victims of excessive force and disproportionate reactions? How easy to consider them chopped liver. It saves thought, and man is a lazy animal, who does not like any cognitive dissonance.

 
At 11:17 PM, November 26, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

hooray for playboy, and free speech! their cartoon shows israel as it is. a totalitarian zionist-supremacist nazi-state whom, when threatened with it's national legitimacy, without fail cries "holocaust" and "anti-semite." meanwhile back in europe, investigations into the event that is supposed to justify it's existence, are halted and those in search of such information are jailed for years, guilty of "holocaust denial."

this cancerous madness must end, not only for palestine, but especially for palestine. keep up the writing, free peoples!

 
At 5:38 AM, November 27, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have an interesting last name (that I won't share with you). Spelled one way, it's English; Spell it another way - drop a single letter - and it's Jewish. And it sounds the same in either case. I mention this because my name gives me the ability to travel between two cultural worlds at will.

Living in the second largest Jewish city in the world - Los Angeles - I find that Jews warm to me all the time. I've also found that they immediately distance themselves once that they discover that I am, in fact, Anglican.

(I should probably add here that I occasionaly sport a Mogen David around my neck to help things along. Such is functioning on an interpersonal or business level in West Los Angeles or the Valley; walk-the-walk, talk-the-talk and all that.)

I bring this up because, upon reading all of the above comments about how most Jews love peace and all mankind, love life, are open minded, all embracing, etc., I feel a need to disagree. They are in fact quite clannish and rejecting of "outsiders." This extends to betrayals of whatever extensions of trust that are made to others.

Now - and mind you - I don't believe this is a "Jewish" trait. It's not the religion. So let's not go down that path. Rather, it is, I believe, an Eastern European peasant trait combined with the "Cult of the Victim" rationalisation that expresses itself as stick-together-and-do-whatever-you-have-to-do-to-survive-'cause-they're-trying-to-get-you-so-we-can-only-trust-each-other mindset.

I feel that as long as Jews - in America, Israel, Europe, where ever - retain this mindset - these traits, they will ultimately sow the seeds of their own destruction.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home